wfw:commentRSS vs. wfw:commentRss
- [in response to a post on the [FeedValidator] mailing
Thanks for the explanation, I have modified my RSS
Guide  to indicate that the capitalization of
wfw:commentRSS is deprecated.
In addition, I will attempt to ensure that this
explanation and recommend that this interpretation is
published in any Best Practices guide of the RSS
--- Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@...> wrote:
> On 4/5/06, Greg Smith <ecomputerd@...> wrote:-------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an interesting subject. In my RSS Guide
> , I
> > link to the few sources of commentRSS vs.
> > I state that "Unfortunately, the link within the
> > Formed Web"  page lists this element as
> > "wfw:commentRSS" and the Chris Sells Specification
> > lists this element as "wfw:commentRss".
> > There is also a decent explanation why
> > was correct .
> > Since the time I wrote the RSS Guide (within the
> > few months) it appears that the text at the wfw
> > has been changed to wfw:commentRss.
> > Does anyone know where the recent history of the
> > page changes has been documented?
> I changed the Well-Formed Web site after it was
> out to me that it disagreed with Chris Sell's
> after all he is the author of the spec. I would have
> made a
> bigger deal of it had I realized how many
> of commentRss there were.
> Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, ahttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
> groundbreaking scripting language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media.
> Attend the live webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into
> this new coding territory!
> Feedvalidator-users mailing list
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around