Re: The children of
- --- In email@example.com, Phil Ringnalda <philringnalda@g...>
> draft-1 says of the rss elementCorrected, thanks. Here's the revised rss section:
> "This element is required and must contain only one child: a channel
> which strikes me as eminently reasonable, and unsupported by 2.0.1-rv6,
> which does require exactly one child channel element ...
This element is REQUIRED and MUST contain one child element: a channel
element. The rss element MUST NOT contain more than one channel.
I incremented the draft to 1.01.
Because this is just a proposal, I didn't save the old draft. Should I?