Re: [rss-public] RSS Draft 1.08 Change Notes
- rcade wrote:
> RSS Draft 1.08 Change NotesIt has been a week. Time for a draft 1.09.
In my opinion, the best way to determine if adding descriptions of those
extension elements which affect how the core elements interpreted
improves or takes away from the spec is to simply produce a draft and
see how it goes. If it works, it stays, if not, it will get chucked
before the final revision. For that reason, I'd suggest that 1.09 try
an appendix with content:encoded.
Note: some of the issues ahead, particularly with guid, are thornier.
- Sam Ruby