Re: [rss-public] FriendFeed's Simple Update Protocol
- rcade wrote:
>Neither place any limits on the number of atom:link elements in such
> Also, neither RSS 1.0 nor RSS 2.0 allows multiple channel-link tags,
> so this would only be valid in an Atom feed.
contexts. Atom links with a rel="self" are already commonplace in RSS
- Sam Ruby
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Sam Ruby <rubys@...> wrote:
> Neither place any limits on the number of atom:link elements in suchTrue. But the documentation for SUP doesn't say that RSS publishers
> contexts. Atom links with a rel="self" are already commonplace in
> RSS 2.0 feeds.
should use atom:link in their feeds to define a provider. The docs
just say to add a link tag.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 8:45 AM, rcade <cadenhead@...> wrote:
> After posting I found an alternative idea employed by Six Apart -- an
> update stream in Atom format with updates from any TypePad or Vox blog:
> There's also something Radio UserLand does -- a channel-category tag:
> The domain is a changes.xml file on a Weblogs.Com-style ping server.
Seems like quite the hack.
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
- rcade wrote:
> Are you aware of any IRI-based relationships that are currently in useI know Google uses IRI-based relationships in number of their feeds. Have a
> employing atom:link in feeds?
look on Google calendar and Picasa for some examples.
Not that I'd necessarily recommend anything that Google is doing, but if
you're just looking for examples...