Re: To Do
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "rcade" <rcade@...> wrote:
> > As it stands now, the current draft makes the contradictory claimAgree, let's lose 24. But further, the statement "RSS documents that
> > that 24 is a valid value for the <hour> element, and that all
> > documents that conform to this draft also conform to RSS 2.01
> > revision 6.
> If that's how the inclusion of an hour value of 24 is being perceived
> (as a change to the format), I'd favor losing value 24.
conform to this specification also conform to its predecessor. No
changes have been introduced to the format." is likely impossible to
respect. I would suggest removing it.