Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [RSS-DEV] The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?)

Expand Messages
  • Danny Ayers
    ... There s plenty more work to do on defining what s being modelled/represented, but I can t see why it shouldn t be possible to straddle this fence quite
    Message 1 of 6 , Sep 21, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      >Switching metaphors, it was (and remains) important for RSS 1.0 to find a
      >comfortable way to sit on the fence between the world of RDF tools and the
      >world of XML tools. Fence-sitting is sometimes both painful and necessary.
      >Apart from re-organising the rdf:Seq mechanism, I don't think there's much
      >else we could've done technically.

      There's plenty more work to do on defining what's being
      modelled/represented, but I can't see why it shouldn't be possible to
      straddle this fence quite comfortably. On one side of the fence, if it's
      valid RDF it's nourishment for RDF tools, and (in principle) wide open for
      extension. On the XML side, a syntax along the lines suggested by
      Shelley/Sean would usable with existing XML tools and is simple enough for
      copy&paste syndication. It doesn't look much like a technical problem, more
      one of PR. Ask not what RSS does for RDF and vice versa...

      The 0.9x community friendly version (a la Shelley/Sean) would simply be a
      subset of format X, a 'Lite' version (to use a barbaric US coinage ;-) Valid
      RDF, but something that could come from 0.9x systems with 3 lines of
      regexp/DOM/XSLT code.
      It would be possible in the spec to explain this by saying what it does,
      without reference to how or why. The user doesn't need to know the RDF
      model, just accept the conventions and one or two peculiar strings (expect a
      few more hits at namespace URIs).

      The 'greater' spec wouldn't really have to introduce anything new - just
      point to the RDF spec and say look, you can do magic with this (ok, maybe a
      few usage examples would be good).

      But in general the docs would be saying: you can do syndication just as
      easily using this as you can with the flat XML format, but potentially your
      feed will be a lot more useful to you and others. You can also do all kinds
      of really cool stuff by using other vocabularies. Are you sitting
      comfortably, "There once was a man named Ora Lassila..."

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.