4042Re: [RSS-DEV] Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question)
- Sep 25, 2002
>That's my point. I can't see why not either - but we can't just assumeOk. Well, if you want, I can take the 1.0 Module Building doc, turn it into
>that that's the right approach, and the spec gives us no clues, nor any
>way of making a decision on such a thing. Or even raising the point. I
>would have liked the 2.0 spec to have been closed when, and only when,
>these things were totally worked out and documented.
a 2.0 Module Building doc, and then that "2.0 roadblock" will be removed.
>them all the time. To take only those who talk about the specs at all,Where do you stand on the namespace/core issue? If the RSS source and spec
>is to take a very self-selecting group. My dad loves RSS, he just
>wouldn't recognise it over HTML if he viewed source. The simplicity of
>the spec, for him, is meaningless.
is meaningless to an end-user, it sounds like people are implying that
making it more meaningless (by requiring knowledge of namespaces) isn't a
Morbus Iff ( rootle-dee-tootle-dee-toot! )
Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/
Tech: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779 - articles and weblog
icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>