4041Re: [RSS-DEV] Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question)
- Sep 25, 2002On Thursday, Sep 26, 2002, at 00:13 Europe/London, Morbus Iff wrote:
>>>> major concern is also with the namespaces. There appears to be noThat's my point. I can't see why not either - but we can't just assume
>>>> indication as to how modules should work. With RSS 1.0 there is,
>>>> or less (whoa there), a 'grammar' of sorts that tell us how to
>>> "how modules should work", to whom? The end-users, or the developers?
>> The developers. I'm increasingly of the mind that the end-users, such
> Could you be more specific? Why not just
> replace "1.0" with "2.0" in this document:
that that's the right approach, and the spec gives us no clues, nor any
way of making a decision on such a thing. Or even raising the point. I
would have liked the 2.0 spec to have been closed when, and only when,
these things were totally worked out and documented.
As for the (now lost through careless snipping) point about why do
people go on about 0.9x's simplicity v 1.0, that's because the only
people who go on about it at all are those who read the specifications
and are interested in the raw thing. To most users RSS is the little
orange button to press to get the cool headline thing working that nice
Mr Iff's program. Most users have never seen an RSS feed. They just use
them all the time. To take only those who talk about the specs at all,
is to take a very self-selecting group. My dad loves RSS, he just
wouldn't recognise it over HTML if he viewed source. The simplicity of
the spec, for him, is meaningless.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>