4033Re: [RSS-DEV] Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question)
- Sep 26, 2002Morbus Iff wrote:
> First off, some ground rules:My concern: it introduces the ability to use XML namespaces for future
> - no dictator Winer comments.
> - no "we need RDF" comments.
> - no "this isn't a community spec" comments.
> And now, the question:
> Why is RSS 2.0 bad?
extensions, whilst simultaneously failing to use it for the extensions
introduced in 2.0. If those extensions were folded into an extension
module, 2.0 and 1.0 would be both technically and conceptually a lot
closer. The core of RSS doesn't need much more than 'item', 'channel',
'link', 'title', 'description'. A simple common core could represent that.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>