1812Re: Blogify && Peerkat
- Mar 22, 2001Morbus Iff <morbus@...> wrote:
>> As far as I'm concerned, there's only one correct choice, and that's the ISOhttp://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
>> and W3C standard: W3CDTF, which is also the only format allowed in RSS 1.0.
> I don't know of this. Do you have a link/example?
>> Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like Blogger spits that out.Yeah, I know... Well, I guess we'll see...
>> Perhaps we should write Ev?
> I know he's pretty busy - I'm not sure if he'll bite. Especially since he's
> producing RSS in the pay version of Blogger (Blogger Pro), and he may not
> be so suave about catering to a ... subversive method ;) ...
> Worth a shot, though.
[ Aaron Swartz | me@... | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>