Re: [rootsradicals] Re: Tongue placement
- Yes, I visualized that sort of accident, too--gouging out tarmac at the
Thinking about it some more, though, I'm wondering just how strong the
forces are on that bolt. The real point of attachment is with the
On my Surly Instigator frame, the chain-stay bridge has a smaller
diameter than the chain stays. Since the aluminum plate is supposed to
bridge the chain stays, whether I put the tongue over or under the
chain-stay bridge, I had a gap in the aluminum plate and the chain-stay
bridge. This means, I found it really easy to bend the aluminum plate!
In other words, that's what happens when you keep cranking the nut on
that bolt... So, I bought a few back-up aluminum plates, but am still
using the bent one (it has a slight but noticeable curve). To keep from
bending it more or from bending future plates, I bought some steel
washers with about the same diameter as the gap between chain-stays and
stacked them to fill the space between chain-stay bridge and aluminum
plate. It's all tight and I've not noticed any shifting of tongue,
plate, or washers.
Sunny Keach wrote:
> I've been flirting with putting the tongue under the chain stay, to get
> slacker angles.. I do know why the directions say not to. If the bolt
> that holds it in place or the chunk of aluminum it's connected to fail,
> it wont be cataclysmic, meaning that the x rests on the chainstay. If
> the bolt should fail with the x under the chainstay, then there is
> little to stop it from going straight to the ground, possibly at speed.
> that could be a bit ugly. So I am just planning to beef up that
> connection or put some sort of back up strap or cord around it just in case.