Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [revelation-list] Re: Babylon: Rome or Jerusalem

Expand Messages
  • Don K. Preston
    That is why I referred to Rv. 5, and 7 due to the referents to the redeeming shed blood. Atonement is very much present. I probably did not communicate what I
    Message 1 of 27 , Sep 6, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      That is why I referred to Rv. 5, and 7 due to the referents to the redeeming
      shed blood. Atonement is very much present. I probably did not communicate
      what I meant clearly enough however. Thanks for the additional comment.
      Don K
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Ed Garcia <Ed.Garcia@...>
      To: <revelation-list@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:31 PM
      Subject: [revelation-list] Re: Babylon: Rome or Jerusalem


      > In Rev. Paul's response to Mr. Preston he says:
      >
      > "Hmmm. And how clear is substitutionary atonement in Revelation?"
      >
      > More often than not the book of Revelation refers to Jesus as the Lamb. As
      I
      > understand it, Jesus as sacrificial Lamb definitely suggests the idea of
      > substitutionary atonement. When the Lamb takes the scroll the elders
      respond
      > by saying "Worthy are You to take the book and to break its seals; for You
      > were slain, and purchased for God with Your blood men from every tribe and
      > tongue and people and nation." The idea of redemption is one of the
      dominant
      > themes of the prophecy.
      >
      >
      > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > revelation-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      >
      >
      >
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.