Re: [rest-discuss] RDFForms Updated Version
- On 12/15/05, Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@...> wrote:
> Is it correct that you deliberately 'traded' this reliability forYep!
> simplicity and ease of adoption (you mention the 80/20 rule)?
I still *think* it's a useful feature to have, but until a large chunk
of the Web goes asynch (ala ARRESTED and its derivative styles), it's
not worth the bother.
I'll work on the naming issues too. All suggestions gratefully received.
Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com