Re: [rest-discuss] Re: Why GET is an application semantic
- On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 17:27 Europe/Dublin, Paul Prescod wrote:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0085ditto! explaining it as a matter of increasing generality emphasizes
> Can you do the same exercise with POST, PUT and DELETE? That would be a
> valuable set of articles.
why GET et al are 'axiomatic'.
this is something i can send my non-believer colleagues.
> BTW, my to-do list is one item smaller today (well, until that lastYipee!! I enabled the dotcode on WebState already. Looks purdy.
> paragraph 8-); Webdot is now integrated into the RESTwiki, and the
> Wiki itself was upgraded to Moin-1.0, so we've got a whole bunch of
> new features including the rather annoying and unRESTful navigation
> bar that shows you your navigation path through the Wiki.