Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [apps-discuss] FW: I-D Action: draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-00.txt

Expand Messages
  • Markus Lanthaler
    ... Thanks a lot for the feedback Dave. I’ll try to make this clearer in the next version. Cheers, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 3 10:26 AM
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 3:31 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:

      > Seems reasonable, though I had to read it twice to
      > appreciate that non-URNish URIs may also be registered.
      >
      > It might be reasonable to underline this point by having
      > the example registration (not the registration of the
      > example, which is different, though currently the same text)
      > in §3 register an http://example.com/profiles/example
      > instead of the urn:ietf:params:profile:example.
      >
      > Obviously the §5.2 registration should stay the same.

      Thanks a lot for the feedback Dave. I’ll try to make this clearer in the
      next version.

      Cheers,
      Markus


      --
      Markus Lanthaler
      @markuslanthaler
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.