Re: [rest-discuss] request to register 'describes' link relation (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-describes-link-01)
- hello nathan.
On 2012-10-09 13:21 , Nathan wrote:
> Looks good and most useful, is it worth mentioning anywhere that this
> inverse relations(describes being the inverse of describedby) is now
> needed due to @rev falling out of fashion? It may help explain why
> describes wasn't defined by powder in the first instance.
honestly, i think such a comment would probably confuse more people than
it would help. @rev never was a popular idea to begin with and only part
of relatively few vocabularies.
erik wilde | mailto:dret@... - tel:+1-510-2061079 |
| UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) |
| http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |