Re: [rest-discuss] The 'profile' Link Relation Type", Internet Draft draft-wilde-profile-link-00
- On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Erik Wilde <dret@...> wrote:
hello tim.that's a good point, it's a bad case of copy/paste from another link
On 2012-03-06 11:08 , Tim Williams wrote:
> In the "Security" section, "truly believed" seems out of place. Maybe
> something more objective:
> "The 'profile' relation type is not known to introduce any new
> security issues not already discussed in RFC 5988  for generic use
> of Web linking mechanism. "
relation type registration request. now i have copied/pasted your text
thanks,__._,Great stuff Erik.In the IANA considerations it probably should read, as most registration RFCs do.from:Reference: RFC xxxx (this draft's eventual RFC number)toReference: [[ This document ]]-Erlend
- hello erlend.
On 2012-03-06 11:36 , Erlend Hamnaberg wrote:
> In the IANA considerations it probably should read, as most registration
> RFCs do.
> from: Reference: RFC xxxx (this draft's eventual RFC number)
> to: Reference: [[ This document ]]
thanks for the feedback, updated for -01.
erik wilde | mailto:dret@... - tel:+1-510-2061079 |
| UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) |
| http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |