> Here I have to disagree - I don't have any idea what an "official RESTHi,
> project" might be doing.
I have to second Stefan. REST is the name for this architectural style
and with Roy's thesis well defined. Not much left to do. We/you could
further investigate architectures that are so to speak "RESTful"
(follow the style) - but we cannot call them REST. Hence a "REST
project" does not make sense.