5840Re: [rest-discuss] RESTful representation of nouns?
- Apr 5, 2006Hi everybody,
On Apr 5, 2006, at 7:05 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
> The whole verb-in-the-URI-thing is just a rule of thumb that I found
> seemed to help some brought-up-on-RPC types I know to convert to a
> state transfer style.
Thanks for all the comments, they all helped add a little bit of
clue, including this:
> Places are nouns, too. All you are doing is giving the URI of a
> that performs stateless conversions. The GET interface simply
> tells you
> how to use the service (e.g., HTML form), there is no other resource
> involved, and there is no sustained benefit across multiple
> (no reusable resources other than the service itself).
> I hate to quote myself, but in sec 126.96.36.199:
> "REST components perform actions on a resource by using a
> representation to capture the current or intended state of that
> resource and transferring that representation between components."
> so what you have defined above is a one-resource RESTful service that
> merely reflects a different shade of state back to the client.
So, services (even those that look like verbs) can be stateless
resources, too, as long as they aren't implicitly masking -other-
> That's a different beast -- it is a gateway, and it would "look"
> more RESTful simply by choosing a different URI syntax, e.g.
Ah, I get it. If, for example, it always returned the result as:
That would be non-RESTful (er, unprincipled? :-), because it doesn't
actually create real resource.
> It talks about resources, as in
> *re*sources, because that is what we want from a distributed
> hypermedia system (the ability to reuse those information sources
> through the provision of links). Services that are merely end-points
> are allowed within that model, but they aren't very interesting
> because they only amount to one resource. The really interesting
> services provide many resources.
Okay, that actually makes sense. I now officially have at least one
more clue than I did before...
-- Ernie P.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>