41Re: The woes of conneg (was: RESTifying)
- Jan 17, 2002--- In rest-discuss@y..., Mark Nottingham <mnot@m...> wrote:
>Not sure if I understand method=PUT and accept together.
> In combination with the method and conneg hacks, then, I could have
> (not really applicable to this representation, but you get the idea)
PUT would have a content-type though.
Identifying the editable representation is a bother.
Once I tried uri?method=edit but didn't like that, so ditched it
before anybody noticed.
Tried uri?layout=editor - moving in the right direction. Kept that
for a while.
Don't know what to try next. Maybe uri?view=editor - 'view' is a
wonderfully ambigous noun/verb.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>