Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

4090Re: [rest-discuss] Implementing MONITOR

Expand Messages
  • Seth Johnson
    Jan 2, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Jan Algermissen wrote:
      > Seth Johnson wrote:
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@...>
      > > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:30:55 +0100
      > > Subject: Re: [rest-discuss] Implementing MONITOR
      > >
      > > So the monitored resource would have to only POST existing
      > > standard "content types?"
      > Hmm...yes. what is the problem with this? Or in other words: why
      > is this a problem in the case of MONITOR but not a problem for
      > the other methods?
      > Or am I misunderstanding your point?

      Well, I think that POST is supposed to be much more flexible than that. But
      I'm not sure it matters, after all.

      Seth Johnso


      DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders!

      New Yorkers for Fair Use

      [CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc

      I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of
      this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be
      attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for
      usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
      exclusive rights.
    • Show all 13 messages in this topic