1190Re: [rest-discuss] Re: GoogleAPI is Rest?
- May 1, 2002
> Rather than argue over the details of what is and isn't available, letsWell put. What are the missing pieces?
> focus on building.
> Maybe evangelizing is a part of the work. For example, make the point
> that service description tools, specifically Visual .NET, apply equally to
> REST development. So let's do it. but let's not fool ourselves into
> thinking that once somone embraces the one true faith they'll find full
> featured toolkits.
- discovery (wsdl-style declarative formats, intellisense-tool friendly
- clients (do we need to write new 'resource modelling friendly' clients in
all the languages or can we re-user protocol API libraries?)
I don't think we need asynch stuff immediately, since there isn't an
existing body of resource that support it to hook up to.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>