Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019. Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More

1first article-due on Mon, 17 November 2008

Expand Messages
  • pari_ni_kristo
    Nov 10, 2008
      Classification of the Sciences and Divisions of Philosophy
      A. Particular and General Sciences
      At the time of the thirteenth century, the West possessed a
      comprehensive classification of the sciences, which we may well look
      upon as one of the characteristic achievement of the mediaeval mind,
      and which, in its main features, lasted up to the time of Wolf.
      At the lowest stage we find the particular sciences, -- which for the
      Schoolmen were the same as the experimental sciences. Such are
      Astronomy, Botany, Zoology, Human Physiology, Medicine, also Civil
      and Canon Law, which became separate and autonomous sciences in the
      twelfth century.
      They derive their particularity:
      • (a) From the material object, which is particular. They are
      concerned only with a restricted section of the corporeal world.
      Botany, for instance, has nothing to do with economic wealth.
      • (b) From their formal object, which, in consequence of what
      we have just said, cannot be grasped or abstracted from all reality,
      but only from a more or less restricted section of it.
      But the detailed study of the sensible world by sections does not
      satisfy the mind. After the details, we seek for a comprehensive view
      of the whole, and this can only be furnished by philosophy. The man
      of science is like a stranger who explores a city bit by bit, and
      walks through the streets, avenues, parks, museums and buildings one
      after another. When at length he has wandered over the city in all
      directions, there still remains another way of becoming acquainted
      with it: from the top of a tower, the city would present to him
      another aspect, -- its divisions, its general plan, and the relative
      disposition of its parts. The philosopher is just such a man: he
      views the world from above as it were, and tries to realize its
      general structure, for philosophy is a generalized knowledge of
      things, a synthetic view of that material world of which alone we
      have direct and proper knowledge, and then by extension, of all that
      is or can be (III, B). It is human wisdom (sapientia), science par
      excellence. This general science or philosophy constitutes the second
      stage of knowledge.
      In contrast to the particular sciences, philosophy derives its
      generality,
      • (a) From its material object, -- which is all that exists or
      can exist. The man who takes in, by a single glance, the whole of a
      city from the top of his tower does not exclude any part from his
      regard, but he only looks for the general aspect of the whole, that
      which belongs to all and not merely to some of its parts. In the same
      way philosophy, instead of dealing with only one department of
      reality, takes in all the real.
      • (b) From its formal object which consists of points of view
      that affect and are found in all reality. Indeed these comprehensive
      views are possible only because the mind seizes in the immensity of
      reality certain aspects which are present everywhere and in
      everything, and which in consequence belong to the very essence of
      reality. Philosophy is defined as the investigation of all things by
      means of that which is fundamental in them and common to all.
      Sapientia est scientia quae considerat primas et universales causas
      [1].
      In other words, philosophy is a science which coordinates or makes a
      synthesis, for the materials it studies and the point of view from
      which it studies them are both characterized by generality. What are
      these general and comprehensive points of view or aspects which the
      human mind discovers in its study of the universe? This question
      brings us to the division of philosophy.
      B. Division of Philosophy
      Starting from a well-known classification of Aristotle, Thomas
      remarks that philosophical sciences admit of a first subdivision into
      theoretical and practical. The human mind (for all science, as we
      have seen, is a work of the mind) can come into contact with the real
      in general, or, as it was then called, the 'universal order,' in two
      ways. In the first place we may study this universal order such as it
      is in and for itself, and look for its general features, without
      subordinating this knowledge to ourselves. This constitutes a
      speculative or theoretic philosophy, the end of which is knowledge
      for its own sake. Or, in the second place one may study the universal
      order of things not as such, but in so far as it enters into relation
      with our conscious life (knowing, willing, producing). It is in this
      sense that this part of philosophy is called practical.
      Each of these two groups admits of further subdivision. Speculative
      philosophy comprises Physics (in the Aristotelian sense) [2],
      Mathematics, Metaphysics. Practical philosophy includes Logic, Moral
      Philosophy, Esthetics. Let us consider these various classifications
      in the light of the scholastic teaching concerning the construction
      of the sciences.
      C. Speculative Philosophy
      The division of speculative philosophy into Physics, Mathematics,
      Metaphysics does not correspond to three separate sections of being
      in the universe [3], but results from the varying profundity of point
      of view or degree of abstraction with which we study the totality of
      things. Physics, mathematics, and metaphysics, all study the material
      universe as a whole, but each studies a particular aspect of all
      reality, change, quantity, and being, respectively.
      (a) Physics. Everything is carried along on the stream of change,
      which the Schoolmen called motus (from moveri). The study of change
      in its inmost nature and its implications is the first step in a
      general understanding of the universe. It is the task which belongs
      to Physics or to the philosophy of nature. Since man forms part of
      the world of sense reality, psychology is a department of physics,
      and the epistemological inquiry belongs to psychology.
      (b) Mathematics. But there is in the sensible universe something more
      profound than change, -- namely, quantity. For every change is
      closely bound up with conditions of time and space in which the
      change takes place, while quantity, on the contrary, as studied in
      numbers and geometric figures, is grasped apart from the sensible
      condition of real quantified beings. Mathematics, which studies
      quantity and its implications, is for the Schoolmen a general and
      therefore a philosophical science, -- a conception to which
      contemporary mathematicians tend to return.
      (c) Metaphysics. Lastly, beyond change and quantity, metaphysics
      seizes in the things of experience the most profound aspects of
      reality, the strata which underlie all the others: being and the
      general determinations of being such as essence, existence,
      substance, unity, goodness, action, totality, causality, etc. These
      most general aspects of reality themselves constitute a synthetic
      view of the material universe. But while change, which implies
      duration in time, and while quantity, which is the primary attribute
      of bodies, depends on the material state of the universe, this state
      is not essential to the notion of being or those other ideas which
      are correlative to it. If there should be suprasensible beings, such
      as God, or the soul, then these metaphysical notions would be
      applicable to them, with certain necessary corrections. In this way
      natural theology and the non-experimental part of scholastic
      psychology really form part of metaphysics.
      D. Practical Philosophy
      Practical philosophy is equally general in character, since through
      our conscious powers of knowing, willing, and producing we enter into
      relation with all reality. This general category includes logic,
      moral philosophy or ethics, and the philosophy of art or esthetics.
      Logic draws up a scheme of all that we know, and the method of
      constructing the sciences; as there is nothing that the human mind
      cannot know in some imperfect way, logic is a general science.
      Ethics, again, studies the realm of human conduct, and there is
      nothing in human life that cannot become the subject of morality. It
      is to be noted that politics and domestic ethics are, like individual
      ethics, merely applications of general moral philosophy. The
      philosophy of art deals with the order achieved by man externally
      through the guidance of reason, as when, for example, "he builds a
      house, or makes a piece of furniture." Philosophy of art here
      includes the study of the mechanical as well as the fine arts.
      It is easy to realize that we have adopted this philosophical
      classification in the preceding parts of this work [4].
      Particular sciences precede philosophy, and the latter must be in a
      sense based upon them. The programme of the Faculty of Arts in the
      Universities of Paris and Oxford was inspired by this principle. The
      arrangement by which the particular sciences form the threshold of
      philosophy gives to the latter an experimental basis, or, as we
      should say today, a scientific foundation. General views presuppose
      particular or detailed one to a certain extent.

      Notes:
      1. In Metaph., I, lect. 2.
      2. From the Greek word for nature. Not to be confused with "Physics"
      in the modern sense, which is a particular science.
      3. As in the division introduced by Wolf, for whom speculative
      philosophy concerns itself with (a) nature other than man, i.e.,
      Cosmology, (b) man, (Psychology), (c) God, i.e., Natural Theology or
      Theodicy. Wolf reserves the name Metaphysics for considerations
      common to all three groups. For a chart describing the Wolffian
      division, see Diagram: Divisions of Philosophy in the Adventures of
      Philosophy section.
      4. As for mathematics, and the controversies of the thirteenth
      century concerning numbers, quantity, mathematical infinity, and so
      on, a clear understanding of these questions is not essential to our
      present aim, and we therefore pass over them in silence. It will be
      noticed that in the above classification the philosophy of art is
      placed in the group of practical sciences. We might, however, regard
      it instead as a third and separate group, corresponding to the
      poetical sciences of Aristotle.