Fw: Outliners (was :RE: [blogunlimited] Progress....)
- Ah yes, the classic conundrum, do all of Dave's work for him, perhaps at the
request of some naive third party, have Dave shit all over it, steal the core
ideas and then implement them wrong.
Tread carefully... You know you'll get nothing in return... A few compliments
in the beginning, of course, but as the issues get sticky Dave will lose
interest and leave you hanging.
But you know this already...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Canter" <marc@...>
Cc: "Paolo Valdemarin" <paolo@...>; "Marc Barrot" <marc@...>;
"Joi Ito" <jito@...>; "Jimmi Johnson" <jimmij@...>;
"Grant K Rauscher" <grant@...>; "Jason DeFillippo" <jason@...>;
"Jamie Fenton" <jamie@...>; "Danny Goodman" <dannyg@...>; "Doug
Baron" <dougb@...>; "Chuck White" <chuck@...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 4:10 PM
Subject: RE: Outliners (was :RE: [blogunlimited] Progress....)
> > But I also reckon the OPML spec was frozen when it should have been
> considered a prototype.
> Ah - so now we stumble (albeit purposefully) into a domain which has been
> bugging me. What else is needed for OPML?
> Wihtout muddying the waters and prejudicing anyone - let's just say - I
> think there's a WHOLE lot that can be done here.
> So to start off with - how 'bout some concrete examples - suggestions that
> YOU - Mr. Danny - would like to see in OPML? If you had your wish - how
> would it be different?
> - Marc