640Re: [quenya] Re: Nephi 3 & 4
- Oct 5, 2002Jumping on the bandwagon...
--- Petri Tikka <kari.j.tikka@...> wrote:
>are you implying, that *tulle is an illogical
> > > UGH! ***_ln_ is impossible in Quenya.
> > Then what exactly is the past tense of _tul-_
> "come"? (which, by the
> > way, is well attested...)
> _t�le_ (LR:47).
>**except for _ada_ "against" which appeared in one of
> > > no, no, No, No, NO, ABSOLUTELY NO!! No
> intervocalic _d_ in Noldorin
the Vinyar Tengwar 43:33
> > > Quenya, no three vowels in a succession. Both**what about oio?
> No, I dont't think so. _pro-_ means "for" (they are**I would rather suggest r� "on behalf of, for", it
> actually from the same
> Indo-European stem). _pheemi_ means speak.
> *_anquet-_ would be an
> exact transltion. *_anquetindo_ would be "prophet",
> *_anquetta_ "prophesy".
suits the desired meaning better IMHO
BTW, Petri, with all respect, you _were_ a bit
arrogant. In my very humble opinion.
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>