Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Polynomials

Expand Messages
  • Andrey Kulsha
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/primenumbers/files/Articles/polynomials.pdf (51k) There s an interesting polynomial sequence with easy-factorable coefficients,
    Message 1 of 33 , Nov 2, 2002
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/primenumbers/files/Articles/polynomials.pdf (51k)

      There's an interesting polynomial sequence with easy-factorable coefficients, which I found two years ago when studying Lucas sequence for Mersenne prime test (4, 14, 194, ...).
      These polynomials seem to have something general with Lucas polynomials of degree 2^n. Maybe it's the way to prove my two-year-old conjecture described in the paper?

      Great thanks for comments,

      Andrey


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • djbroadhurst
      ... Bad models. ... No. Rather it is that n1, the begining of the sampling interval, needs to be substantially larger than sqrt(a), for the HL heuristic to win
      Message 33 of 33 , Jul 28, 2013
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com,
        "WarrenS" <warren.wds@...> wrote:

        > > Let N(a,n1,n2) be the number of primes of the form
        > > n^2+n+a with n in [n1,n1+n2]. Then the data
        > >
        > > N(247757,0,10^6) = 324001
        > > N(3399714628553118047,0,10^6) = 251841
        > >
        > > seem to favour the smaller value of a. Yet these data
        > >
        > > N(247757,10^12,10^6) = 148817
        > > N(3399714628553118047,10^12,10^6) = 193947
        > >
        > > indicate that the larger value of a is better, in the long run.
        >
        > --these numbers seem to be in vast violation of naive statistical
        > models.

        Bad models.

        > Is the reason, that the length n2 of the sampling interval,
        > needs to be substantially larger than a, in order for naive
        > statistical models to become reasonably valid?

        No. Rather it is that n1, the begining of the sampling
        interval, needs to be substantially larger than sqrt(a),
        for the HL heuristic to win out. Clearly when
        n1 < sqrt(3399714628553118047), Marion was comparing apples
        and oranges, since log(n^2+n+a) was dominated by "a".

        All I did was to level the playing field, here:

        > N(247757,10^12,10^6) = 148817
        > N(3399714628553118047,10^12,10^6) = 193947

        to allow the HL heuristic to show through.

        It's a simple as that. No shock-horror for statisticians;
        Just a trivial observation by a log-lover :-)

        David
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.