RE: [PrimeNumbers] Digest Number 634
>I would disagree with 4 appearing twice,So it should be:
>you used up both 2's with the first occurrence
From: djbroadhurst [mailto:d.broadhurst@...]
Sent: 28 July 2002 09:37
Subject: [PrimeNumbers] Digest Number 634
I agree, Dick. Jon was neither accurate nor novel.
Had he been able to count up to 8 successfully,
as you did, he might have realised that the
general formula is 2^bigomega(n), where
bigomega(n) is the number of prime, but not necessarily
distinct, divisors. 20=2*2*5; bigomega(20)=3; 2^3=8.