Re: [PrimeNumbers] Re: k.2^n+/-1 series
- A belated reply here, but check my webpage www.glasgowg43.freeserve.co.uk/nashprim.htm
for straightforwardly-generated numbers with very high Proth weight - in the equivalent context of Nash weight.
In terms of searching through those in the webage, some of the k-values are already taken, including:
(the last by me). There will be plenty of others available which should provide large numbers of small primes of the form k*2^n+1.
If you want to know more about the divisibility properties of these numbers, then go to
From: robert44444uk <100620.2351@...>
To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08 April 2002 02:33
Subject: [PrimeNumbers] Re: k.2^n+/-1 series
On the question of proth weights for k, the highest I found to date
is for 39.37#+2.31#+20.29# (289939302102450) which has a weight of
4.216. I'm sure there are higher values than this.
I am not 100% convinced by the proth weight concept. I ran this
number up to n= circa 3,200 both plus and minus one, and got 43 and
31 primes, which seems pretty average to me. As a comparison,
67#.2^n+1 plus yielded 70 primes up to n=3,300, (and 88 up to
n=18,000) with a proth weight of (only) 4.191
That said, Jack's applet is an interesting tool and I use it!
Carlos Rivera has rejected 23#.2^n-1 as the most populous -1 series,
(95 primes) because it has an index p/ln(n) of 8.00, compared to
Jack's record of 9.083. It seems you must beat not only the absolute
number of primes, but also the index to get a listing for puzzle 6
On processing speed - on my machine, PRP and pfgw are about the same.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Unsubscribe by an email to: email@example.com
The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]