Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [PrimeNumbers] Most abundant numeral

Expand Messages
  • Jon Perry
    ... results. No point, coz 0*10 is 0. Jon Perry perry@globalnet.co.uk http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~perry/maths BrainBench MVP for HTML and JavaScript
    Message 1 of 5 , Apr 1, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      >Increase your limit by a factor of, say, 10 and see if you get the same
      results.

      No point, coz 0*10 is 0.

      Jon Perry
      perry@...
      http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~perry/maths
      BrainBench MVP for HTML and JavaScript
      http://www.brainbench.com


      -----Original Message-----
      From: Jud McCranie [mailto:jud.mccranie@...]
      Sent: 31 March 2002 04:06
      To: Jon Perry
      Cc: Prime Numbers
      Subject: RE: [PrimeNumbers] Most abundant numeral


      At 09:09 AM 3/30/2002 +0000, Jon Perry wrote:

      >Did you test to some limit?

      >Hmmm, not really. I did however create a sequence of numbers that I thought
      >was optimally aesthetitic. Maths kind of went out the window.

      Increase your limit by a factor of, say, 10 and see if you get the same
      results.



      +---------------------------------------------------------+
      | Jud McCranie |
      | |
      | Programming Achieved with Structure, Clarity, And Logic |
      +---------------------------------------------------------+




      Unsubscribe by an email to: primenumbers-unsubscribe@egroups.com
      The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org



      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.