Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Most abundant numeral

Expand Messages
  • Jon Perry
    After exhaustive testing, I have determined the most abundant numeral for primes in a given base: 2:0 3:1 4:1 5:0 6:3 7:2 8:4 9:7 10:1 11:3 12:A 13:0 14:1 15:A
    Message 1 of 5 , Mar 29, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      After exhaustive testing, I have determined the most abundant numeral for
      primes in a given base:

      2:0
      3:1
      4:1
      5:0
      6:3
      7:2
      8:4
      9:7
      10:1
      11:3
      12:A
      13:0
      14:1
      15:A
      16:F

      Jon Perry
      perry@...
      http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~perry/maths
      BrainBench MVP for HTML and JavaScript
      http://www.brainbench.com
    • Jud McCranie
      ... Did you test to some limit? +---------------------------------------------------------+ ... +---------------------------------------------------------+
      Message 2 of 5 , Mar 29, 2002
      • 0 Attachment
        At 10:20 PM 3/29/2002 +0000, Jon Perry wrote:
        >After exhaustive testing, I have determined the most abundant numeral for
        >primes in a given base:

        Did you test to some limit?


        +---------------------------------------------------------+
        | Jud McCranie |
        | |
        | Programming Achieved with Structure, Clarity, And Logic |
        +---------------------------------------------------------+
      • Jon Perry
        Hmmm, not really. I did however create a sequence of numbers that I thought was optimally aesthetitic. Maths kind of went out the window. Jon Perry
        Message 3 of 5 , Mar 30, 2002
        • 0 Attachment
          Hmmm, not really. I did however create a sequence of numbers that I thought
          was optimally aesthetitic. Maths kind of went out the window.

          Jon Perry
          perry@...
          http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~perry/maths
          BrainBench MVP for HTML and JavaScript
          http://www.brainbench.com


          -----Original Message-----
          From: Jud McCranie [mailto:jud.mccranie@...]
          Sent: 30 March 2002 00:48
          To: Jon Perry
          Cc: Prime Numbers; Phil Carmody
          Subject: Re: [PrimeNumbers] Most abundant numeral


          At 10:20 PM 3/29/2002 +0000, Jon Perry wrote:
          >After exhaustive testing, I have determined the most abundant numeral for
          >primes in a given base:

          Did you test to some limit?


          +---------------------------------------------------------+
          | Jud McCranie |
          | |
          | Programming Achieved with Structure, Clarity, And Logic |
          +---------------------------------------------------------+




          Unsubscribe by an email to: primenumbers-unsubscribe@egroups.com
          The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org



          Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
        • Jud McCranie
          ... Increase your limit by a factor of, say, 10 and see if you get the same results. +---------------------------------------------------------+ ...
          Message 4 of 5 , Mar 30, 2002
          • 0 Attachment
            At 09:09 AM 3/30/2002 +0000, Jon Perry wrote:

            >Did you test to some limit?

            >Hmmm, not really. I did however create a sequence of numbers that I thought
            >was optimally aesthetitic. Maths kind of went out the window.

            Increase your limit by a factor of, say, 10 and see if you get the same
            results.



            +---------------------------------------------------------+
            | Jud McCranie |
            | |
            | Programming Achieved with Structure, Clarity, And Logic |
            +---------------------------------------------------------+
          • Jon Perry
            ... results. No point, coz 0*10 is 0. Jon Perry perry@globalnet.co.uk http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~perry/maths BrainBench MVP for HTML and JavaScript
            Message 5 of 5 , Apr 1, 2002
            • 0 Attachment
              >Increase your limit by a factor of, say, 10 and see if you get the same
              results.

              No point, coz 0*10 is 0.

              Jon Perry
              perry@...
              http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~perry/maths
              BrainBench MVP for HTML and JavaScript
              http://www.brainbench.com


              -----Original Message-----
              From: Jud McCranie [mailto:jud.mccranie@...]
              Sent: 31 March 2002 04:06
              To: Jon Perry
              Cc: Prime Numbers
              Subject: RE: [PrimeNumbers] Most abundant numeral


              At 09:09 AM 3/30/2002 +0000, Jon Perry wrote:

              >Did you test to some limit?

              >Hmmm, not really. I did however create a sequence of numbers that I thought
              >was optimally aesthetitic. Maths kind of went out the window.

              Increase your limit by a factor of, say, 10 and see if you get the same
              results.



              +---------------------------------------------------------+
              | Jud McCranie |
              | |
              | Programming Achieved with Structure, Clarity, And Logic |
              +---------------------------------------------------------+




              Unsubscribe by an email to: primenumbers-unsubscribe@egroups.com
              The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org



              Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
            Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.