Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Backtrack?

Expand Messages
  • d.broadhurst@open.ac.uk
    PS: I looked to see how many backtracks there were in ... answer = 15 backtracks in 353 steps For my money, that was a small price to pay, at this bitsize, for
    Message 1 of 7 , Dec 2, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      PS: I looked to see how many backtracks there were in

      > Binary size = 7560
      > Running time 53h 38mn 42s for path

      answer = 15 backtracks in 353 steps

      For my money, that was a small price to pay,
      at this bitsize, for complete avoidance of Run 2.
      Opinions may vary, but experiment should
      at least be allowed, please, Marcel.

      David
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.