Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [PrimeNumbers] We have missed some twins?..

Expand Messages
  • Nathan Russell
    ... Not to shatter your hopes, but even if the second number is indeed prime the chance of it being an original discovery is quite slim. Nathan
    Message 1 of 3 , Feb 14, 2001
      On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:38:45 +0200, you wrote:

      >Hello!
      >
      >Why Proth 6.3 doesn't want to test 9*10^3-1 for primality
      >when it finds 9*10^3+1 to be prime?
      >
      >Perhaps, some beautiful twins were missed thus...
      >
      >Thanks,
      >
      >Andrey

      Not to shatter your hopes, but even if the second number is indeed
      prime the chance of it being an original discovery is quite slim.

      Nathan
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.