Re: [PrimeNumbers] Close, but no cigar
- At 10:33 AM 10/29/01 +0000, Paul Jobling wrote:
>I see from the "primes added" mail thatActually this is correct. The page will take the floor and report 50896
>"10^50897-5*10^25448-1" has got 50897.999999999 decimal digits! I eagerly
>await the first prime with exactly e^(pi*sqrt(163)) decimal digits...
digits, but will
use the whole expression (roughly log(n)+1) to sort the list. The problem
is solely that
you got to see something you should not have--an internal format.