RE: [PrimeNumbers] Two anti-div diamonds (correction)
Brainbench 'Most Valuable Professional' for HTML
Object-Oriented Links at Cetus
Subscribe to Delphiadvanced:
From: Dan Morenus [mailto:dmorenus@...]
Sent: 29 September 2001 17:44
To: Jon Perry
Cc: Prime Numbers
Subject: Re: [PrimeNumbers] Two anti-div diamonds (correction)
OK, do you mean, "A number p is prime iff two consecutive
integers a and a+1 do not share an anti-div, and p = 2a+1" ?
The sad part is I haven't dug into the archives deep enough
to know what an anti-div is. :P
Jon Perry wrote:
>-- Dan Morenus (dmorenus@...)
> The original statement is wrong, for example 24:7,16 and 25:2,3,7,10,17.
> This is because 49 is a square.
> A number is prime iff two consecutive integers do not share an anti-div.
> Jon Perry
-- This parachute is not warranted to be suitable --
-- for any purpose, including descending safely --
-- from an airplane to the ground. --
Unsubscribe by an email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/