Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [PrimeNumbers] Re: Digest Number 3642

Expand Messages
  • bobgillson
    Absolutely fascinating David, including your CV! Thank you for sharing this paper with us. Bob ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Message 1 of 4 , Feb 15, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Absolutely fascinating David, including your CV!

      Thank you for sharing this paper with us.

      Bob

      On 15 Feb 2013, at 22:52, "djbroadhurst" <d.broadhurst@...> wrote:

      > --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com,
      > Kermit Rose wrote:
      >
      > > how do we know what zeta(2) is
      >
      > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.4238.pdf Problem 3
      >
      > > and how do we know what zeta(4) is?
      >
      > Section 2.3 of same essay
      >
      > David
      >
      >


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • djbroadhurst
      ... Jack s ratio is the subject of a notable erratum: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026939500269Q ... David
      Message 2 of 4 , Feb 15, 2013
      • 0 Attachment
        --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com, bobgillson@... wrote:

        > Absolutely fascinating David

        Jack's ratio is the subject of a notable erratum:

        http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026939500269Q

        which links to a .pdf file acknowledging a "pitiable" mistake:

        > In our original computer program for the evaluation of the
        > three-loop QCD correction to the rho parameter a pitiable mistake
        > was overlooked. The wrong value 2/5 was substituted for
        > zeta(2)^2/zeta(4) = 5/2.

        David
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.