Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Digest Number 3642

Expand Messages
  • djbroadhurst
    ... http://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.4238.pdf Problem 3 ... Section 2.3 of same essay David
    Message 1 of 4 , Feb 15, 2013
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com,
      Kermit Rose <kermit@...> wrote:

      > how do we know what zeta(2) is

      http://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.4238.pdf Problem 3

      > and how do we know what zeta(4) is?

      Section 2.3 of same essay

      David
    • bobgillson
      Absolutely fascinating David, including your CV! Thank you for sharing this paper with us. Bob ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Message 2 of 4 , Feb 15, 2013
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        Absolutely fascinating David, including your CV!

        Thank you for sharing this paper with us.

        Bob

        On 15 Feb 2013, at 22:52, "djbroadhurst" <d.broadhurst@...> wrote:

        > --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com,
        > Kermit Rose wrote:
        >
        > > how do we know what zeta(2) is
        >
        > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.4238.pdf Problem 3
        >
        > > and how do we know what zeta(4) is?
        >
        > Section 2.3 of same essay
        >
        > David
        >
        >


        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      • djbroadhurst
        ... Jack s ratio is the subject of a notable erratum: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026939500269Q ... David
        Message 3 of 4 , Feb 15, 2013
        View Source
        • 0 Attachment
          --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com, bobgillson@... wrote:

          > Absolutely fascinating David

          Jack's ratio is the subject of a notable erratum:

          http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026939500269Q

          which links to a .pdf file acknowledging a "pitiable" mistake:

          > In our original computer program for the evaluation of the
          > three-loop QCD correction to the rho parameter a pitiable mistake
          > was overlooked. The wrong value 2/5 was substituted for
          > zeta(2)^2/zeta(4) = 5/2.

          David
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.