Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [PrimeNumbers] Re: Conjecture Ludovicus V

Expand Messages
  • Phil Carmody
    ... That value went through my head too, certainly. If it is log(2), I would hope that there is a sound reason for it to be so. Phil
    Message 1 of 6 , Nov 11, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      --- On Sun, 11/11/12, djbroadhurst <d.broadhurst@...> wrote:
      > --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com, Phil Carmody <thefatphil@...> wrote:
      > > 17 131101 0.6948838285968673741945871092
      > > 18 262147 0.6944460786798661063812187741
      > > 19 524309 0.6969871254592594758140428033
      > > 20 1048583 0.6992402515337114838314592173
      > > 21 2097169 0.7007186928388776062866463444
      > > 22 4194319 0.6970925620012833876499535047
      > > 23 8388617 0.6951323183116127789119946883
      > > 24 16777259 0.6948711428730801610212743660
      > > 25 33554467 0.6956608736980247707005160260
      >
      > Looks like an expensive method of approximating log(2) ?
      >
      > David (with no sound basis for this guess)

      That value went through my head too, certainly. If it is log(2), I would hope that there is a sound reason for it to be so.

      Phil
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.