## Re: Known pairs vs OEIS A002072

Expand Messages
• ... These values are indeed the largest known (there may be larger ones). Doubt is not about smallest but about for all i m . ... For p = 229 we have
Message 1 of 4 , Mar 10, 2012
> I wonder if the largest pair list at A002072 should
> include some statement that certain values are
> "smallest known" rather than "smallest", as the
> latter assumes the values can be confirmed in
> some rigorous manner.

These values are indeed the largest known
(there may be larger ones). Doubt is not about
"smallest" but about "for all i>m".

> I do have a new entry for p = 229, having
> found this pair (S, S+1):
>
> S = 15487655655079919751646464

For p = 229 we have 5.2*sqrt(p)-7.7 = 71,
so I expect N about exp(71), which is much

Best regards,

Andrey
• This 181-smooth pair popped up in a random search:   S = 90672220863645734556839376   Factors   S   = 2^4, 3^3, 11, 23, 29, 31, 37^2, 73, 97,
Message 2 of 4 , Mar 12, 2012
This 181-smooth pair popped up in a random search:

S = 90672220863645734556839376

Factors
S   = 2^4, 3^3, 11, 23, 29, 31, 37^2, 73, 97,
139^2, 163, 167, 181
S-1 = 5^4, 13^3, 17, 19, 43, 47, 67^2, 101^2,
113^2, 173

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.