Re: PFGW 3.5.4
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "j_chrtn" <j_chrtn@...> wrote:
>You should see "scrptify" in the distribution. You can convert a C-like script into PFGW's internal language.
> --- In email@example.com, "djbroadhurst" <d.broadhurst@> wrote:
> > Good news regarding nextprime() in version 3.5.4:
> > 1) I failed to fool it, despite starting close to some
> > infamous pseudoprimes. So BPSW is working well, here.
> > Big thanks to David Cleaver and Mark Rodenkirch.
> I could not imagine when I asked Mark for a nextprime function in pfgw about 2 weeks ago that it would be such a work and that it would generate such interest. But now, thanks to Mark's great work an with the help of people here we finally got it and it seems quite performance!
> Once again, thank you guys.
> And now, what could be the next improvement in pfgw?
> As I told Mark offline, my dream would be to have a C or Unix BC like language support in pfgw. But I know it's a lot of work :-(
- ---- Phil Carmody <thefatphil@...> wrote:
> Equating a request to use the most appropriate venue for discussion to expressing a desire for someone to leave the list seems more than a little over the top. (And a falsity, to boot.)Will do.
> Mark, can you try to restrict minor updates about PFGW to the channels devoted to it, please? That's after all precisely what they exist for. Casual prime hunters are going to want to know about stable major updates, but without stability, such updates can do more harm than good.