On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Maximilian Hasler

<

maximilian.hasler@...> wrote:

>

>

>

> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:57 PM, woodhodgson@...

> <rupert.weather@...> wrote:

> >

> > The first 19-tuplet (I think), 630134041802574490482213901 +

> > {0, 6, 10, 16, 18, 22, 28, 30, 36, 42, 46, 48, 52, 58, 60, 66, 70, 72, 76},

> > gives one a "century" with (at least) 19 primes. Still a long way off from the

> > possible century maximum of 23 in computational terms, I imagine.

> >

>

> In the 1st century, you have 25 primes :

>

> 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61,

> 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97.

>

> For further information, see http://oeis.org/A186311

>

> Maximilian

>

The first 25 primes do not make an admissible constellation. It is

impossible to find that pattern repeated anywhere else.

Tom