Re: [PrimeNumbers] Demichel
- --- On Sun, 1/2/11, Andrey Kulsha wrote:
> > e^(iwy) e^(iwy) e^(-iwy)Maths by guesswork? What happened to rigour? Then again, seeing how long those two take to get from 24/8 to 3, I suspect that the papers will be closely associated with rigor mortis.
> > ------- = ------- + --------
> > p B + iy B - iy
> I guess they mean the conjugated pair of zeta zeros.
> 3d. Re: DemichelShows that that dissertation did not have careful proofreading.
> Posted by: "Phil Carmody" thefatphil@... thefatphil
> Date: Sun Jan 2, 2011 4:32 am ((PST))
> --- On Sun, 1/2/11, Andrey Kulsha wrote:
>> There are also two new (very similar, huh)
>> papers analyzing and improving these results:
> "In 1914, numerical evidence proved that π(x)< li(x) for all x. "
However in 1914 Littlewood proved that pi(x)-Li(x) assumes both positive
and negative values infinitely often.