- --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com,

"mikeoakes2" <mikeoakes2@...> wrote:

> > My revised count up to 2*10^10 is 116.

http://physics.open.ac.uk/~dbroadhu/cert/dbmo116.out

> My (original) count up to 2*10^10 was 105.

> So it must have missed 11, i.e. a bigger proportion.

gives my 116, in the format [n, factors, number of solutions]

With n < 2*10^10, the record-holder for the number of solutions is

[2214495361, [13, 17, 23, 29, 83, 181], 147407]

which googles quite nicely, linking to

http://www.cs.rit.edu/usr/local/pub/pga/fibonacci_pp

David - --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com,

"mikeoakes2" <mikeoakes2@...> wrote:

> > My revised count up to 2*10^10 is 116.

http://physics.open.ac.uk/~dbroadhu/cert/dbmo116.out

> My (original) count up to 2*10^10 was 105.

> So it must have missed 11, i.e. a bigger proportion.

gives my 116, in the format [n, factors, number of solutions]

With n < 2*10^10, the record-holder for the number of solutions is

[2214495361, [13, 17, 23, 29, 83, 181], 147407]

which googles quite nicely, linking to

http://www.cs.rit.edu/usr/local/pub/pga/fibonacci_pp

David