my corrections had nothing to do with you specific composites, thank God
or the corrections would have been wrong! you're wrong, just admit it.
From: leavemsg1 <leavemsg1@...
Sent: Sat, October 9, 2010 7:13:43 PM
Subject: [PrimeNumbers] Re: T-Sequence faster than APRT-CLE
I don't want to be a thorn in your side, but I've fixed
the "T-Sequence" or as you call it, "2-Selfridge" test.
I've produced both the Adobe Flex 4 application re-work
and 80 lines of generic code that will accurately detect
ALL composites. I corrected the co-authors' interpreta-
tion of their T-Sequence apparatus; it was as simple as
the wart on your nose. (you called yourself some kind of
a troll watcher, remember ???) The test has to pass two
full periods with a different seed each time to be proved
as prime, correctly; it's also in pure polynomial time!
> > Caveat lector: Bill's "T-sequence" declares
> > 74442383 = 8627*8629
it reads as composite... after my corrections.
> > to be prime.
> Here are 3 more composites that Bill has "proven" to be prime
> 94954861 94502701 94222127
these don't prove as prime either, now.
I corrected the interpretation of the 2-Selfridge test.
> Anyone who knows how to google can now find lots more.
semper paratus; quam operor vos amo illud pomum?
I took Latin in high school also...............
take a look... www.oddperfectnumbers.com, if you like...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]