## Re: "wriggly" probable primes

Expand Messages
• ... If a different mode of analysis is used there is no wriggly problem. If A = 8635073539 then A appears twice on A = 5x^2 + 5xy + y^2 at x = 14353, y =
Message 1 of 50 , Sep 7, 2010
>
> Here is an example with a 42nd root of unity:
>
> p=8635073539; a=1342131859; print(znorder(Mod(a,p)));
> 42
>
> It fools these test:
>
> > 1. p is an odd positive integer,
> > 2. a is an integer with kronecker(a,p) = -1,
> > 3. a^((p-1)/2) = -1 mod p,
> > 5. Mod(1+x,x^2-a)^p = 1-x mod p,

> David
>

If a different mode of analysis is used there is no
"wriggly" problem. If A = 8635073539 then A appears
twice on A = 5x^2 + 5xy + y^2 at x = 14353, y = 58418
and at x = 28701, y = 26557, and is therefore composite.

Aldrich Stevens
• ... [4] is meaningless, as it stands. You should write a double mod: 4. (1+x)^p = 1-x mod(x^2-a,p) ... There is no reason whatsoever to believe that [1] to [4]
Message 50 of 50 , Sep 29, 2011
"bhelmes_1" <bhelmes@...> wrote:

> 1. let a jacobi (a, p)=-1
> 2. let a^(p-1)/2 = -1 mod p
> 3. a^6 =/= 1 mod p
> 4. (1+sqrt (a))^p = 1-sqrt (a)

[4] is meaningless, as it stands.
You should write a double mod:

4. (1+x)^p = 1-x mod(x^2-a,p)

> 1. Is it possible that there are other exceptions

There is no reason whatsoever to believe that
[1] to [4] establish that p is prime. Morevoer,
some folk believe that, for every epsilon > 0,
the number of pseudoprimes less than x may
exceed x^(1-epsilon), for /sufficiently/ large x.

> 2....
> there is a cyclic order ...

> 3....
> there is a cyclic order ...

The group of units (Z/nZ)* is /not/ cyclic
if n has at least two distinct odd prime fators.

David
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.