Re: Primes and a Liouville number...
- --- In email@example.com, "antidyne" <antidyne@...> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone in here could confirm or invalidate thatequations (ii & iii) on...
> Also, any second set of eyes of the rest would be much helpful.I just had a glance at the page, and think it is nonsense.
The chi(p) "function" isn't a function, neither are there primes raised
to the negative power of 10. (And IMO the appearance of "10" is also a
sign of irrelevance.)
Skipping to equation (x) at the bottom of the page, which reads:
> What is absolutely certain, and straightforwardly solved for,Constant.
> whether the conjecture is true or not is that the following is true:
> XXX * ( XXX + i alpha/XXX )^(-1) = 0.999... + alpha i
> Where the Imaginary part of the result equals the Fine Structure
I think everyone who followed a first introduction to calculus can judge
the value of this statement and "result".
The value 10^kappa * tau of XXX is completely irrelevant here,
and makes me think that the rest of the page is equally worthless.