Re: [PrimeNumbers] questio,What is..
- At 09:03 AM 7/30/01 -0400, Nathan Russell wrote:
> >Hello Norman,Nathan,
> >Sadly it is easy to create an infinite lists of PRP for any
> >given base (see the usual proofs, I think I have one posted
> >on the prime pages), so I am not sure this is a useful question.
>Perhaps a somewhat better question is whether PRPs found in that way
>make better candidates for primality than, say, ordinary numbers or
Indeed that is better, but the method I had in mind
provides an infinite list of composite PRP's, so they'd not be too useful.