Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Carmichael Numbers

Expand Messages
  • Maximilian Hasler
    ... As far as I understood, the D-numbers are /defined/ as those for which this is an integer; your conjecture says that this is a CN, but it isn t. Maximilian
    Message 1 of 11 , Apr 5, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com, Devaraj Kandadai wrote:

      > Now let us take the smallest in the seq A 104017 viz 11305=5*7*17*19
      >
      > My conjecture: 4*11304*11304/6*16*18 is an integer and so it is.

      As far as I understood, the D-numbers are /defined/ as those for which this is an integer; your conjecture says that this is a CN, but it isn't.

      Maximilian

      PS: the posts 2e4 and 2e4-1 are empty since you cannot send attachments. But we have the Pomerance-Alekseyev proof at http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=55271
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.