- --- On Sat, 11/8/08, Alex Petty <alexander.petty@...> wrote:
> is this for real?

Please don't top-post. "This", as a demonstrative pronoun, refers to prior context, yet you've placed the context after it.

> amin B wrote:

And now to address your actual question - "is this for real?".

> > Hello friends

> > Being shocked when I have heard such this amazing news

> > that an Iranian professor named MR Moosavi has explored the

> > prime numbers formula.

> >

> > http://www.primenumbersformula.com/

Yes, that mail really was sent to the mailing list.

Yes, that website really does exist.

Yes, that website does, as mentioned in the mail, really contain information about a prime number-related formula.

If that doesn't adequately answer your question, perhaps you'd like to ask a slightly less nebulous one.

Phil - let me ask again.

is this a real discovery? i didn't follow the previous explanation.

thanks,

alex

--

alexander.petty@...

cell: +001.540.272.7970

skype: alex.petty

Phil Carmody wrote:>

> --- On Sat, 11/8/08, Alex Petty <alexander.petty@...

> <mailto:alexander.petty%40gmail.com>> wrote:

> > is this for real?

>

> Please don't top-post. "This", as a demonstrative pronoun, refers to

> prior context, yet you've placed the context after it.

>

> > amin B wrote:

> > > Hello friends

> > > Being shocked when I have heard such this amazing news

> > > that an Iranian professor named MR Moosavi has explored the

> > > prime numbers formula.

> > >

> > > http://www.primenumbersformula.com/

> <http://www.primenumbersformula.com/>

>

> And now to address your actual question - "is this for real?".

>

> Yes, that mail really was sent to the mailing list.

> Yes, that website really does exist.

> Yes, that website does, as mentioned in the mail, really contain

> information about a prime number-related formula.

>

> If that doesn't adequately answer your question, perhaps you'd like to

> ask a slightly less nebulous one.

>

> Phil

>

> - Alex Petty wrote:
> let me ask again.

It depends what you mean by real. It works correctly and he may be the first

> is this a real discovery? i didn't follow the previous explanation.

to publish this particular formula, but useless prime formulas based on

Wilson's theorem are common.

The discoverer added mention of it to Wikipedia in June 2007.

I removed it with an edit summary pointing to Wikipedia policies and ending

"Looks trivial, useless, non-notable":

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Formula_for_primes&diff=next&oldid=136831799

At the time I checked that the formula actually works.

It uses the well-known Wilson's theorem (apparently first discovered by the

Arabian mathematician Ibn al-Haytham around year 1000) to test whether 2m+1

is an odd prime. If it is then 2m+1 is produced, otherwise 2. Instead of

writing this as a simple if-then-else, it uses a complicated formula with

the floor function to avoid direct use of an if-then-else construct which is

sometimes not considered an allowed part of a "formula".

--

Jens Kruse Andersen