Re: [PrimeNumbers] Re: Proving Sierpinski conjecture before SoB completes its task
- Phil Carmody wrote:
>I tried (in private email) giving the example of the dual sequences:
> Now reread what Jack wrote (which was also going be in my original post too, but thinking that it was a bit obvious I removed it for brevity), and think a bit more.
They both have the same covering set (it can be found in under a
minute with just a little thought). One of the sequences has a
very easy to find prime; the other one is easily proven to have no