## Re: [PrimeNumbers] Digest Number 1834

Expand Messages
• I do like to read the messages posted on this newsgroup, but.. To my sincere opinion it is not necessary, and certainly not called for, to use the name of God
Message 1 of 1 , Feb 8, 2006
I do like to read the messages posted on this newsgroup, but..

To my sincere opinion it is not necessary, and certainly not called for, to
use the name of God in the sense displayed in a couple of previous messages.

Although probably used here with good intent. Let's just stick to math.

Jan van Delden

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:16 AM

There are 5 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. second mail and two problems of me......
From: ali palang <x_3_14159265@...>
2. YOU KNOW ITS PROOF
From: "THANOOP T" <thanoopt@...>
3. Re: YOU KNOW ITS PROOF
From: mikeoakes2@...
4. New CC Record
From: Gary Chaffey <garychaffey2@...>
5. Re: YOU KNOW ITS PROOF
From: Cletus Emmanuel <cemmanu@...>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 01:10:34 -0800 (PST)
From: ali palang <x_3_14159265@...>
Subject: second mail and two problems of me......

in the name of god
hello to all
these two problems have planned by me,2 years ago;
try to solve them;but there are too easy,just for amusement:
1.suppose this a,b are from N,and a,b>1,prove that,if a+b=p,and p is prime
number
then,(a,b)=1.
...........................
2.find number of pairs (a,b),so a,b>1,,(a,b)=1 and a+b=p,that p is prime
number.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
and then
under the protection of god.

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:43:40 -0000
From: "THANOOP T" <thanoopt@...>
Subject: YOU KNOW ITS PROOF

let A anb B are vectorspaces over C such that
A= { z:exp(az) is algebraic)}
B= { z:exp(bz) is algebraic)}
such that a/b not in Q (rationals)
then how to show that
dim(A intersection B) <=1 or <=2
if any one know the proof pls sent
************************************ Thanoop T
TIFR BANGALORE

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:13:33 -0500
From: mikeoakes2@...
Subject: Re: YOU KNOW ITS PROOF

In an email dated Tue, 7 2 2006 11:43:40 am GMT, "THANOOP T"
<thanoopt@...> writes:

> let A anb B are vectorspaces over C such that
> A= { z:exp(az) is algebraic)}
> B= { z:exp(bz) is algebraic)}
> such that a/b not in Q (rationals)
>then how to show that
> dim(A intersection B) <=1 or <=2
> if any one know the proof pls sent

(a) This is not a well-posed question, for example:
"A= { z:exp(az) is algebraic)}" is not a meaningful definition of a vector
space over the complex numbers, and so on.

(b) Your question has nothing to do with prime numbers, and so should not
have been posted to this newsgroup.

-Mike Oakes

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:19:01 +0000 (GMT)
From: Gary Chaffey <garychaffey2@...>
Subject: New CC Record

I have just found the following record Cunningham Chain (1st Kind) length 5
:-

(2^n)*5864262128*1201#-1 For n=0..4

The smallest member of this chain has 514 digits and as far as I know is a
new record for a length 5 CC (1st Kind).....Although it does fall 99 digits
short of the record length 5 CC (2nd Kind)!

Regards
Gary

---------------------------------
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:31:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Cletus Emmanuel <cemmanu@...>
Subject: Re: YOU KNOW ITS PROOF

...And finally, we don't do other people's homework for them ...

mikeoakes2@... wrote: In an email dated Tue, 7 2 2006 11:43:40 am GMT,
"THANOOP T" <thanoopt@...> writes:

> let A anb B are vectorspaces over C such that
> A= { z:exp(az) is algebraic)}
> B= { z:exp(bz) is algebraic)}
> such that a/b not in Q (rationals)
>then how to show that
> dim(A intersection B) <=1 or <=2
> if any one know the proof pls sent

(a) This is not a well-posed question, for example:
"A= { z:exp(az) is algebraic)}" is not a meaningful definition of a vector
space over the complex numbers, and so on.

(b) Your question has nothing to do with prime numbers, and so should not
have been posted to this newsgroup.

-Mike Oakes

Unsubscribe by an email to: primenumbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org/

Mathematics education Mathematics and computer science Number
theory

---------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Unsubscribe by an email to: primenumbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------